Protecting hoiho from setnet fishing deaths

ELI v Minister for Oceans and Fisheries

Hoiho standing in long grass up on a hill above a beach

We challenged the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries’ decision to only close part of northern hoiho habitat to setnet fishing, when the entire population is at risk of extinction.

Although we were not successful on the specific grounds of our judicial review, the judgment delivers powerful clarity about the Minister’s legal duties to protect hoiho.

On the 15th of September 2025, the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, Shane Jones, announced a three-month emergency closure of setnet fishing. The closure extended an existing 4 nautical mile closure, which was in place to protect dolphins, to 8 nautical miles around the Otago Peninsula. The stated aim was to protect hoiho (yellow-eyed penguins) from being killed as bycatch.

On the 3rd of February 2026, we received the High Court judgment on our judicial review.

The Court described hoiho as “priceless” and a taonga, emphasising that their protection is essential “for its own sake.”

While the Court recognised the severe risk facing northern hoiho, it found the Minister’s temporary emergency closure lawful. It said section 16 of the Fisheries Act gave the Minister significant discretion in establishing the parameters of the emergency closure. 

The Court has confirmed that the Minister is required to take whatever measures are necessary to ensure hoiho survival.

As the judge stated, potential economic detriment to commercial fishers could never be a justification for allowing the decline of the population to continue.

In the hearing, both the Crown and Seafood NZ claimed the Fisheries Act is about utilisation of fishing stocks, not a conservation act. However, in its judgment, the Court rejected that characterisation, saying, “Utilisation is permitted only if it can be achieved sustainably. Stocks must be maintained for future generations, and the marine environment must be safeguarded. In considering sustainability measures, the Minister must, among other things, have particular regard to kaitiakitanga.”

Why did we take this case?

The northern population of hoiho, found from Banks Peninsula to Rakiura Stewart Island, is in crisis. This genetically distinct group is rapidly declining and at risk of extinction. Even the death of a single bird from commercial setnet fishing could have a population-level impact.

Between October 2019 and June 2025, 17 hoiho were killed by commercial fishing. The Department of Conservation (DOC) reports that the northern population has collapsed by 80% since 2008—from 739 breeding pairs to just 143. Earlier this year, DOC warned that hoiho could vanish from the mainland within two decades.

 

Case timeline

June 2025 – We wrote to Ministers for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones and Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka, calling for urgent action to protect hoiho.

July – Ministers write back, acknowledging the urgency for hoiho and saying they are waiting on further advice from officials. Minister Jones said the advice will be informed by “a new scientific multi-threat risk assessment”. This was due in August.

July – we wrote back to the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, calling for an emergency closure to protect hoiho in the nesting season, which was due to start in September.

In early September, we wrote to Ministers again, highlighting further developments.

On 15th September, Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones announced an emergency 3-month closure of set-net fishing around the Otago Peninsula.

On 24th September, we filed an application for judicial review with the High Court.

December 1st & 2nd - ELI will present our case in an urgent hearing in the Wellington High Court.

On the 3rd of February 2026, we received the High Court judgment on our judicial review.

 
 

Related cases

 
Previous
Previous

Holding Z Energy accountable for its climate change claims

Next
Next

Climate litigation: Holding the government to account for delivering an effective climate plan