Protecting hoiho from setnet fishing deaths

ELI v Minister for Oceans and Fisheries

Hoiho standing in long grass up on a hill above a beach

We challenging the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries’ decision to only close part of northern hoiho habitat to setnet fishing, when the entire population is at risk of extinction. We await the Court’s decision.

On the 15th of September 2025, the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, Shane Jones, announced a three-month emergency closure of setnet fishing. The closure extended an existing 4 nautical mile closure, which was in place to protect dolphins, to 8 nautical miles around the Otago Peninsula. The stated aim was to protect hoiho (yellow-eyed penguins) from being killed as bycatch.

In our High Court proceedings, we argue that the Minister failed to impose an emergency closure large enough to ensure the sustainability of the northern hoiho population. By restricting the emergency closure to only part of hoiho habitat, some birds remain unprotected. As a result, the closure does not avoid or remedy the harmful effects of commercial setnet fishing on hoiho.

We also argue that the Minister failed to consider the economic value of the hoiho's continued existence to eco-tourism operators. The advice focused on the economic value of fishing but ignored the significant contribution of tourism operators who rely on the existence of hoiho for their livelihoods.

Why did we take this case?

The northern population of hoiho, found from Banks Peninsula to Rakiura Stewart Island, is in crisis. This genetically distinct group is rapidly declining and at risk of extinction. Even the death of a single bird from commercial setnet fishing could have a population-level impact.

Between October 2019 and June 2025, 17 hoiho were killed by commercial fishing. The Department of Conservation (DOC) reports that the northern population has collapsed by 80% since 2008—from 739 breeding pairs to just 143. Earlier this year, DOC warned that hoiho could vanish from the mainland within two decades.

 

Case timeline

June 2025 – We wrote to Ministers for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones and Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka, calling for urgent action to protect hoiho.

July – Ministers write back, acknowledging the urgency for hoiho and saying they are waiting on further advice from officials. Minister Jones said the advice will be informed by “a new scientific multi-threat risk assessment”. This was due in August.

July – we wrote back to the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, calling for an emergency closure to protect hoiho in the nesting season, which was due to start in September.

In early September, we wrote to Ministers again, highlighting further developments.

On 15th September, Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones announced an emergency 3-month closure of set-net fishing around the Otago Peninsula.

On 24th September, we filed an application for judicial review with the High Court.

December 1st & 2nd - ELI will present our case in an urgent hearing in the Wellington High Court.

 
 

Related cases

 
Previous
Previous

Holding Z Energy accountable for its climate change claims

Next
Next

Climate litigation: Holding the government to account for delivering an effective climate plan